by Robert M. Traxler

Did the Russian Federation take a page from President Obama’s administration’s play book when it reportedly hacked into the Democratic National Committee’s email?

The American Department of State under Hillary Clinton advised and funded anti-Putin political efforts in the 2011 Russian Federation elections. Reports of this action were all over the European press, but few and far between in the American media; I could only find a few dozen credible reports.

The Russian Federation also believes Secretary Clinton’s State Department funded anti-Russian political parties in the Ukraine. The elections resulted in the government of the Ukraine reneging on long standing treaties with the Russians, the very treaties that allowed the use of Black Sea all weather deep water ports vital to the Russians’ defensive strategy. Loss of the Crimean Peninsula’s ports resulted in the inevitable Russian invasion and the loss of Crimea to the Ukraine.

The American government and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) under President Obama and Secretary Clinton also had no problem in spending millions to help defeat the sitting president of the only true democracy in the Middle East, Israel. President Obama also had no problem in intervening in the British elections concerning Brexit, even threatening the Brits with direct economic consequences if they rejected the movement toward one world government.

To say that the Russian government was livid over American interference in their electoral process in 2011 is an understatement. The American media, proven to be a partisan arm of the Democratic party, was exposed in the DNC emails and we now have proof positive that the media is a propaganda arm of the liberal movement. Whether the “leak” came from a DNC insider as Julian Assange maintains or from the Russians is questionable. The coverage has been wall to wall about the Russians interfering in our electoral process, and not the dishonesty of the mainstream media or the corruption in our government. The media is once again controlling the message for the DNC and President Obama.

The scandals uncovered in the e-mails have been replaced by a well-planned and directed outrage at the Russians. The bait and switch efforts by the media have been well planned and directed. That statement would have been impossible to make pre-hack, but the DNC emails should forever destroy the credibility of the media.

Assange was the hero of the left before he pulled the ugly scab off the establishment media’s involvement with the government.

Just why do the elite in the media, political and corporate classes (corporations gave nearly a billion dollars to the Clinton campaign effort) detest President-elect Trump? It is easy to understand: he is a direct threat to the status quo, one that has made them all, if not rich, certainty comfortable and powerful. Drain the swamp is meant to reform Washington, a location that was an actual swamp (or need we say wetlands) by the way.

The fact that more than a dozen intelligence agencies all agree 100% on the WikiLeaks origin would be questioned by the media if they were not in bed with the current administration. We as a nation are being spun, a polite word for lied to, by the media/government alliance. Common sense is not so common in the partisan media; when was the last time you ever found 16 people who agree 100% about anything?

The media will love the government up to and including Jan. 20; then they will return to questioning the government’s every move. The media has been proven in the WikiLeaks documents to be directed by the DNC and solidly in the hallelujah corner of the divine church of the political establishment.

Stand by for the saturation bombing of every minute decision President-elect Trump makes. Stand by for the disdain and dishonesty WikiLeaks proved beyond a reasonable doubt exists in the fourth estate toward anyone not an approved member of the media/political class. The establishment has too much to lose to allow Mr. Trump to succeed.