A question coming to the forefront today is what is more important — the truth or social justice? Can we have both? Sure we can, but when a person is blinded by a cause they cannot see the truth. An analogy I like to use is “tree huggers,” people who cannot see the forest, because they are holding so tightly to one tree they can’t see the other trees in the forest around them.
Some in our area are so devoted pro or con to the abortion issue or women’s choice issue they know nothing else. Folks running for township boards declare themselves 100% pro or con on abortion; yet no township board member can do anything about abortion. It is a tree in the forest of issues that will let folks vote for them even if there is nothing they can do to deny or allow abortions.
Township boards have hundreds of important issues their vote can impact, but abortion is not one of them. Roads, parks, development, fire, police, housing, zoning, planning and many more, but not abortion.
Folks running for the Michigan State House or Senate who profess their support or non-support for Jerusalem being the capital of Israel — can they impact on that international issue? No, but who cares? Some folks will vote for or against someone based on Jerusalem.
A person running for a Michigan county, township or state office who is for closed or open national borders will be elected in a primary based on an issue they will have no control over, nor will they be able to open or close any international border if elected. The way a politician comes down on the hot button issues matters; it is totally possible for a person to be elected to office without taking a stand on any local issue, anything on which their stands will matter.
I advocated for John James long before President Donald Trump came out supporting him, but many folks voting in the primary will not look at his stand on issues he can affect, and just see whether our President supports him or not.
Tip O‘Neill is credited with saying “all politics are local;” perhaps we need to amend that and say all politics are national. Quite frankly I do not care what a person running for a township board thinks about abortion, immigration, North Korea or the Russians; they can and will not do anything to affect those issues. Tell us about farming issues, zoning issues, environmental issues, roads, taxes, fire, police, parks and local issues they can affect.
Whether or not a person is a member of a church has been in local campaigns for many years; that is great, but it matters, how?
We in Michigan are lucky that we do not have to follow the most severe environmental laws; we are one of a few states that has not signed onto a federal law that requires an environmental study before developing property that has an intermittent mud puddle on it. Anyone running for state office needs to be asked and openly state what their stand is on this important issue.
Folks are not concerned with local issues; what is your stand on open or controlled borders, allow abortions or not, support the military or not. They are all issues no local or county elected official has any impact upon, but we elect folks based on national issues, why?
Be darned if I know; however, we need to ask local candidates local questions concerning local problems and solutions and vote accordingly. Will we concern ourselves with local issues? Probably not; however, we should.
I look to the editor of this on-line newspaper. He is a confirmed liberal; however, he and I agree on most local issues. We do not agree on many national or international issues, but the left and right can agree on many things if we just do not hug our ideological trees so tightly that we cannot see the forest of vital local issues all around us.
10 Comments