Charges of trespassing and disturbing the peace against Constitutional attorney Katherine Henry were dismissed Thursday in Allegan County District Court in connection with an incident on Election Day November 2020 in Leighton Township.
“Now it is time to sue for false arrest and damages all those involved in this Allegan County mafia style judicial and government system. Leighton Township and its clerk, Allegan County Sheriff Frank Baker and the specific deputies, the Allegan County Prosecutor Myrene Kay Koch and those from her office that pursued this unlawful farce,” posted Stephen Young, chairman of the Tea Party of Allegan County and a Republican candidate for county commissioner in the Aug. 2 primary election.
District Judge Bill Baillargeon dismissed the charges.
Young added on Facebook, “Judge Bill B.could no longer ignore the obvious even though he certainly wanted to do that. His so-called manhood was in a slowly tightening vice, and he just had to remove that pain, which was only getting worse day by day… Interesting that Judge Bill B. admitted that an individual has the right to not only protest, but even resist arrest a false arrest. That is a true, but amazing admission by any judge, let alone one from Allegan County.”
Henry, of Hudsonville, was arrested on Nov. 8, 2020, after she showed up at the Leighton Township polling site and was accused by Leighton officials of disrupting the election process. The founder of the Restore Freedom Initiative, she was ordered to leave the premises of the Leighton Township Hall on the afternoon of Election Day for trying to collect petition signatures.
Henry was soliciting petition signatures near the township hall during Tuesday’s general election, which prompted local officials to order her to vacate the site.
Stephen Young, chairman of the Allegan County Patriots, said then, “This appears to be the Allegan County Sheriff’s Department intimidating free speech and right to assemble.”
County Sheriff’s deputies ordered Henry to leave Leighton Township property after she failed to comply with Township Clerk’ Mary Lou Niewenhuis’ request she do so. She posted the confrontation between her and a deputy on You Tube, maintaining she was threatened with arrest.
Henry set up a table at the township hall parking lot to collect signatures for a Restore Freedom petition, to amend the state constitution to “reign back in government power.” She insisted her operation was in compliance with rules to distance at least 100 feet from the township hall.
She said in the video, “They are, he (the deputy) says, going to arrest me if we don’t leave right now because the township owns this property and the township said we have to leave.”
The attorney said Allegan County Sheriff Frank Baker had been in contact with Barry County Sheriff Dar Leaf to discuss the incident.
Henry said she and Leaf are both members of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, which asserts county sheriffs are America’s “last hope” to turn the country around and get it back “on the freedom track laid for us by our Founders.” Leaf has been widely criticized for his comments about two of the 14 men arrested in connection with the alleged plot to kidnap and execute Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.
Henry insisted there is a law that allows for dissemination of campaign literature as long as the person doing so is beyond 100 feet from the entrance of an election polling site.
Henry afterward said in a Facebook post that she was handcuffed and placed in the back of the cruiser.
Some local officials have suggested Henry deliberately staged the event and alerted local media in order to gain publicity for her cause.
Why no article on the 2 felony charges against the former Dorr township elected official? Maybe that doesn’t fit the agenda.
Perhaps you know something I don’t. Have charges been filed? Or is this “fake news?”
I thought you were a seasoned reporter. Should I give a fish or teach you how to fish. Arraignment was on 7/7/22 57th District Court,Allegan County. No fake news from me.
Dave didnt your twin help you out wow missed it by one day. Maybe Joseph Blow has more time than you. Boy what a bunch of blow hards!!
Inquiring minds want to know.
“Some local officials have suggested Henry deliberately staged the event…”
I would love to know what officials thought that this was staged?
Sheriff Deputies Langlois, Anderson, or Bussell don’t know the law or constitutional rights. And they wanted to remain ignorant when a constitutional attorney was trying to talk to them.
Go To Top
Michigan Legislature
Michigan Compiled Laws Complete Through PA 119 of 2022
House: Adjourned until Wednesday, July 20, 2022 1:30:00 PM
Senate: Adjourned until Wednesday, July 20, 2022 10:00:00 AM
Michigan Legislature
User Menutiny housedown arrowmini menu
What we have here is a judge who failed to upload the law that is clearly stated in the election law act. She should have been slapped with a nice fine and community service.
MICHIGAN ELECTION LAW (EXCERPT)
Act 116 of 1954
168.744 Prohibited acts; violation as misdemeanor.
Sec. 744.
(1) An election inspector or any other person in a polling room, in a compartment connected to a polling room, or within 100 feet from any entrance to a building in which a polling place is located shall not persuade or endeavor to persuade a person to vote for or against any particular candidate or party ticket or for or against any ballot question that is being voted on at the election. A person shall not place or distribute stickers, other than stickers provided by the election officials pursuant to law, in a polling room, in a compartment connected to a polling room, or within 100 feet from any entrance to a building in which a polling place is located.
(2) A person shall not solicit donations, gifts, contributions, purchase of tickets, or similar demands, or request or obtain signatures on petitions in a polling room, in a compartment connected to a polling room, or within 100 feet from any entrance to a building in which a polling place is located.
(3) On election day, a person shall not post, display, or distribute in a polling place, in any hallway used by voters to enter or exit a polling place, or within 100 feet of an entrance to a building in which a polling place is located any material that directly or indirectly makes reference to an election, a candidate, or a ballot question. Except as otherwise provided in section 744a, this subsection does not apply to official material that is required by law to be posted, displayed, or distributed in a polling place on election day.
(4) A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor.
History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955 ;– Am. 1972, Act 60, Imd. Eff. Feb. 22, 1972 ;– Am. 1995, Act 261, Eff. Mar. 28, 1996 ;– Am. 2012, Act 156, Imd. Eff. June 5, 2012
Popular Name: Election Code
All of these have an area of effect that is within 100 feet. They VERY clearly do not apply to anything beyond 100 feet, which is where this issue took place. Judge followed the law. You just didn’t read it well.