The Dorr Township Library Board has decided to reconsider the date of its millage request, opting for the March Michigan presidential primary instead of the August primary.
The Library Board last month voted to place an 0.6-mill increase proposal on the August 2020 election ballot, but Library Director Elyshia Hoekstra asked for a special meeting Monday night (Dec. 2) to reconsider.
Library Board President Rachel Vote said Hoekstra was able to persuade the board to change course because of fears the library millage question would be buried under an avalanche of issues and candidates in August. The request in March would be in addition to only the Democratic and Republican primary votes for nominating a presidential candidate.
The request will remain at six-tenths of a mill for 10 years.
Meanwhile, the Friends of the Library group is tasked with raising the roughly $3,000 to cover costs of placing the issue on the ballot in March. There would be no cost in August.
The Library Board in August 2018 asked for a half-mill increase, but it was defeated by a margin of 1,070 to 634. The board came back in a special election last August, seeking one mill, but that was rejected by a vote of 629 to 529.
Since then library officials have agreed to lover the amount of the request to 0.6.
Library Board Secretary Sara Rydeman last month asked the Dorr Township Board for guidance on whether the millage should be requested in August or in the March presidential primary. The board told her the date and amount was up to library officials.
Dorr Township Trustee John Tuinstra, who actively campaigned against the millage request last August, told Rydeman the millage should remain at 0.289 with a renewal and then a request for more should be a separate issue.
Rydeman replied that the 0.289 levy is not enough for the library to continue operations and offer programs. It already has begun to cut back on programs and services in the wake of the two millage defeats.
Rydeman also told the Township Board the state can penalize libraries for not raising more than three-tenths of a mill in local revenue.
11 Comments