by Lynn Mandaville
Two storms struck the United States this past week.
The second storm to strike chronologically was a sinister force of nature, a hurricane named Laura, the twelfth such named storm of the summer.
Laura is no longer even a blip on a weather radar map, but she was a category 4 storm which made landfall in Louisiana on Thursday, Aug. 27. She had sustained winds of 150 mph, her anticipated storm surge had been described as “unsurvivable,” and she wreaked such havoc on the residents along the Louisiana coast that the physical clean-up and rebuilding will take years.
It’s not like we don’t know about hurricanes. They’ve been happening to us data-happy Americans for long enough that we’ve created a separate season named after them.
We’ve expended all kinds of money, science and technology to understand them, to track them, and to create models of how they behave. Meteorologists pride themselves on their ability to predict the paths and the kind of destruction we can expect of them.
Because of all that we’ve learned about hurricanes, we’re able to order advance evacuations of threatened coastlines when it’s warranted. We’re able to buy plywood by the forests-full with which to board up buildings, and we’re able to fill sandbags by the dune-full with which to hold back the flood waters.
Engineers and entrepreneurs have invented and marketed to homeowners in storm-prone areas heavy duty storm shutters and tie-downs to protect their domiciles.
And humanity has developed such an arrogance toward Mother Nature that people are still allowed to rebuild in and on those same threatened places that have been ravaged numerous times over.
(Such folly is the financial price we pay for outsmarting acts of God.)
The first storm that struck us last week didn’t have a name.
It struck on Sunday, Aug. 24, in Kenosha, Wisc., in the form of horrendous violence committed against an unarmed black man by a white Kenosha police officer.
It didn’t require tremendous human force, just the overzealousness of a cop whose gun delivered seven bullets at point blank range into the back of another human being.
It struck, however, with a ferocity that rivaled that of Laura, not just by virtue of the paralysis it caused its victim, but in the mental pain and suffering to a nation already on the edge because of a pandemic.
We don’t know a lot about the nature of these human-caused storms, in spite of their increasing frequency.
They don’t have a designated season – at least not yet. And we don’t routinely name them – although it seems we are getting to know each one by the name of its black victim.
As a nation, we don’t spend millions upon millions of dollars studying these storms. We don’t track them, or predict their severity based on scientific models. We don’t try to develop ways to protect ourselves from them. And we don’t have a FEMA-equivalency to handle a crisis after a storm has wreaked its vengeance on a community.
Social scientists have postulated some valid ideas as to the myriad causes for these storms. Possible predictors have been identified: poverty, joblessness, poor education, poor health care, skin color, and the institutionalized inequality caused by unchecked racism.
It seems, however, that, as a nation, we have no concerted or sustained interest in studying the root causes of these storms, or of committing the money, time, or energy required to fend off these storms or mitigate their damage the way we do with hurricanes.
We don’t care too much about collecting data about them.
The havoc that is wrought by these storms is so much greater than whatever collateral damage might occur from rioting, arson or looting.
It involves more than just a clean-up and rebuild.
It is measured by the immeasurable psychological harm done not only to the victim and his family and friends, but to the victimizer, and to the victimizer’s colleagues who now become guilty by association.
It is measured by the unquantifiable mental harm done to an entire community who loses its trust in a traditionally trustworthy institution like law enforcement.
It is marked by the inevitable, evolving guilt among another community that had no idea that its ordinary, day-in and day-out behavior was preventing a nation’s emergence from the evils of its history of slavery and intolerance.
(Such folly is the penny wisdom and dollar foolishness of not outsmarting acts of Man.)
Two storms struck the United States this past week.
They struck only days apart.
Two entirely different kinds of storms.
Two similar outcomes.
Ms Mandaville
It’s quite possible neither storm would be so catastrophic if only people took responsibility for their actions.
Building in areas that are known for floods, fire, and winds is basically not very intelligent.
Your second storm would never happened if people again took responsibility for their actions. When law enforcement requests you to do something just do it.
Ah!! But in today’s society we make our own rules, noone can tell us what to do.
If by chance we were born of different skin tone or ethnicity we ” don’t need no laws” to tell us what is right or wrong.
This has bred a society that honors criminals with riots, their names on shirts and sporting equipment, destroying whole communities….just because that individual failed to act responsible and do the correct thing.
Sadly because we have become a society of tolerance….even though we know that person was wrong. We not wanting to stand for law and order join and except this destruction of property and life.
Things must likely will never return to the “old normal ” be that good or bad. One should come to realize that this is building to a disastrous outcome. Will it be a war against socialism, an ethnic war, a civil war, or just plain war based on me being white and your skin color different….
only time will tell. Just as will people stop building in areas known for national disasters.
Mr. Smit,
Please tell me that I have misunderstood the tone of your response.
What I’m reading between the lines is that Jacob Blake deserved to be shot in the back seven times at close range because he didn’t do what he was told to do (whatever that might have been).
According to a Kenosha DA this morning, an investigation is being done in earnest to divine the particulars of this fiasco. Almost nothing is being released to the general public (wisely, I think) at this point.
It is my personal opinion, based only on seeing what all of America has seen on TV, that seven bullets to the back close range was excessive force for not doing what he was told to do (which we don’t know, if it was anything at all).
Contributing to what I hope is my misunderstanding of your remarks is your line “If by chance we were born of different skin tone or ethnicity ‘we don’t need no laws’ to tell us what is right or wrong.” Wow. Did you intend to sound so condescending, so racist?
Please tell me my interpretation of your comment is incorrect.
Ms. Mandaville
Since you have asked I’ll try to answer.
In regards to the shooting… in my mind, if someone is pointing a firearm at you, you have two choices — comply or be shot. It’s when people decide they don’t have to comply and go to court. Instead, have the attitude of go ahead shoot me if you dare. Very seldom does anyone win in that game. Plus, using the term murder in an act of defiance just doesn’t seem logical.
As to am I racist? Aren’t we all at sometime in our life been?
My statement was trying to say it makes no difference if I have “white privilege.” BLM, LGBTQ, or any other group, including Republicans, Democrats, Independents, Libertarians etc., one has to face the fact skin tone (color) does enter into their actions and thoughts.
Those saying they are “color blind ” in assessing a personcare just out and out lying to themselves. This Country for hundreds of years has used, race (color) ethnicity, religion, and other factors to judge people.
Today the term “racist” is used commonly to describe anything one disagrees wit.
Racism/racist seems to be justifiable in terms of the wanton violence and destruction in the current day. What are all these riots based on? The accusations of mistreatment because of someone judged to be racist in their actions.
If because I believe in law and order, following rules, and treating others as they treat me makes me a racist in your eyes… I can never change that and won’t even try.
There are two sides to every coin and only the exteriors are different. The middle never changes.
Ms. Mandaville, what I think Mr. Smit is trying to say nicely, while I’m somewhat more direct (some might interpret as crude, no bulls#@t), people of all colors don’t listen to what they are being instructed to do by law enforcement. For whatever reason, they verbally abuse, shout, threaten, and physically attack officers. The “gentleman” you said was shot in the back was being questioned about physical assault on his girlfriend, who called police for help. He then knew he was going to be detained, fought with officers (having one in a headlock) and returning to his vehicle where he had a knife on the floor of the vehicle. How many times was he told to stop?
I was stopped by the state of Wyoming state police on a vacation. Someone with the same brand, model, and color of car had stolen a TV out of a motel room.
They had guns drawn, approached my car, and asked me to open my trunk. Should I have told them to go to Hell, I ain’t putting up with their shit, and tried to leave? Or do I follow their lawful instructions? You see, I understand English, I can speak it, and I have a brain that told me to cooperate. They were satisfied I was not the thief, holstered their weapons, apologized for stopping me and bade me a good day.
If you are guilty, you won’t follow instructions and do something stupid. Is that a “race” thing? You tell me.