ACHTUNG: This is not a “fair and balanced” article. It is an editorial by the editor.
Perhaps the most seriously wrong-headed and misguided contention in the election of 2020, is the notion that mail-in voting is rife with fraud.
For the umpteenth time, virtually every study has shown that the percentage of voter fraud in the American electoral system is below one-tenth of 1 percent. As Casey Stengel used to say, You can look it up.
Those who purport to believe in such fairy tales, I submit, very simply want to reduce the voting number of us unwashed masses. Yes, I believe that the anti-mail-in voting efforts are tied almost directly to voter suppression.
Some politicians have been caught on audiotape admitting that if too many of “those people” vote, they will lose.
I have long held that if you make something easy for people to do, they will do it. If you make it difficult for them to do it, they won’t. I think recycling programs over the last couple of decades have shown that to be true.
But this problem didn’t just emerge in the 2020 election. Limited democracy and voter disenfranchisement have a long and sordid past in American history.
When the Founding Fathers crafted the U.S. Constitution in 1789, they granted the right to vote only to free, white men who were at least 21 years old and landowners. It was because of public pressure and constitutional amendments over the years that such rights were won for people of color, women and Native Americans.
This is why I don’t appreciate those who insist we strictly follow a constitution adopted in the 18th century. What has made that document and America itself great is the ability to adapt to changing conditions.
And if we subscribe to the notion of power to the people, we must understand that virtually the only power we everyday stiffs actually have is in voting. More than one million have sent in their votes. Even President Trump does it.
So I have been an enthusiastic supporter of no-excuse absentee balloting and voting by mail for some time. I noted with great satisfaction in the November 2018 general election that Michigan voters by more than a two-thirds majority approved a proposition to make absentee and mail-in voting much easier to do. I’ve never been a fan of forcing the unwashed masses to appear at the polls on a Tuesday, a day most of them have to work, to stand in line and exercise perhaps their most precious right.
So now I believe we are righting a past wrong by making it easy to vote. With the threat of Covid-19, the ability to vote by mail is even more critical. And please dispense with the tired claim that if we can stand in line at Wal-Mart, we can stand in line to vote. Wal-Mart is open 24/7. The polls are open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. on Nov. 3.
To be sure, I didn’t like the provision for same-day registration, which only makes things more hectic and challenging on Election Day. And I now sincerely believe a law should be passed to permit clerk’s office personnel begin the process of counting and recording the votes a week before the big day.
But I have grown exceedingly weary of those who have somehow been flim-flammed into thinking voting by mail is dangerous or anti-democratic. You guys don’t like it because it lessens the chances of your candidates getting elected.
Editor,
Seems we have discussed this very topic many times to the point of redundancy. I have a question for you; Do you think we still should be required to produce a photo ID to vote?
Cheers!!
Mr Wilkins,
Most of us who drive register to vote when our driver’s license is issued. Your signature on the drivers license is the same signature your local village, township, city or county clerks check when your mail in / absentee ballot is checked for address and name.
My solution is everyone, beginning with their 18th birthday gets a state drivers license or a state issued photo ID and is registered to vote. (Because not everyone who votes drives) ; Federal and state elections every 2 years is a Federal Holiday; Polls open on Saturday 8:00am to 8:00pm, Sunday noon to 6:00pm, Monday 8:00am to 8:00pm and Tuesday 7:00am to 8:00pm; if you request a hollow by mail one is issued and your signature is used just like it is now.
Why beat around the bush and just say you are interested in limiting votes so people agree with you vote while others with whom you disagree have to jump through more hoops. I suspect it’s because you want to be the guy who screws over democracy with a grin on your face.
PS
I remember you were a big hydroxychloroquine cheer leader in April of this year. Should you be required to take a couple hydroxychloroquine tablets and wash them down with household disinfectant in the presence of voting officials to prove you are not infected with COVID-19?
Cheers
Mr. Editor,
Dave,
You stated “This is why I don’t appreciate those who insist we strictly follow a constitution adopted in the 18th century. What has made that document and America itself great is the ability to adapt to changing conditions.” The Constitution has a provision to up date it, the amendment process, used 27 times. Major social changes have been made using it, why you folks on the left do not offer an amendment to make abortion 100% legal in all cases, install national health care, ban arms ownership, ban fossil fuels and other social changes is puzzling. Perhaps it is because you may loose?
I do agree with you vote by mail is a system that will be adopted but with voter fraud coming with it, the question is how much is acceptable? I am not sure it is illegal for you to offer me $1000.00 for my unopened ballot then toss it away unopened, knowing I would of voted in a cretin way, nothing signed, mailed in, or forged what is the crime? For 25 million, chump change to the Democrats who outspend the Republicans 1.6 to 1, we would have a President Hillary Clinton.
Vote by mail sure, with controls to combat fraud. The left tell us the right commits all the voter fraud if so, (I do not agree it is so) you are handing the right a blank check for votes. Beware of what you wish for as you may get it.
Mr. Couchman,
Sir,
Lets disagree without being disagreeable, your PS is way out of line, and ignorant.
Your comment “I suspect it’s because you want to be the guy who screws over democracy with a grin on your face.” is also out of line. You owe Mr. Wilkins an apology, lets keep it civil.
Mr. Couchman,
I hope your motivation is not descriptive as your name.
Every CITIZEN of the United States at age 18 has the right to vote. It is incumbent upon them to exercise that right. And it is the responsibility of each state, county, and township to make sure the voter is who he or she says they are. That requires a picture ID and a signed voter form stating you are the person you are claiming to be. Did you ever vote in person at a polling site that didn’t require ID?
Do what is the big deal about proving who you say you are?
Absentee balloting is legal and used extensively. Mail-in balloting is another problem altogether. Some states send ballots to residents who don’t request them, they are sent indescriminately to residents, whether they still reside at that residence, are dead, or moved to another state.
Both absentee and mail-in ballots are filled out and sent back without knowing if the person signing the ballot completed it or was it filled out by someone else?
This is a Democrat led initiative to provide ballot stuffing. Simple as that.
If people are so lazy on election day to not go to the polls and cast a ballot, unless they are disabled or unable to get to the polls, then the absentee ballot should be used, otherwise, put a mask on and get to the polls.
Mail-in indiscriminate balloting should be outlawed.
Just an FYI in response to your question about voting in person at a place that did not require ID. My husband and I voted for 30 odd years in Hopkins Twp. without every producing an ID.
I am SO glad that AZ has mail-in voting during this pandemic (which has been in place for several years without discernable fraud). At my advanced age I would hate to have to hang out at a polling place for hours on end.
Early voting sounds fine. No really, it does. However, there is a lot more responsibility upon the local government to ensure that voting fraud does not occur. Double checking every signature, ensuring no double ballots, etc. It is naive to think that this is not more possible when you don’t actually see the person and verify their identity in person via a standard ID. Just look at how much fraud already takes place in welfare programs. No matter how small it is, it still exists. And, like the article suggests, make something easy to do, fraud, the people will do it. So, is it easy in the case of early voting? No, not likely, but it is easier. Here is one example: domineering husband oversees wife fill hers out now that she can’t do it in secret at the polling station. That kind of voter intimidation I’m confident swings toward both side of the aisle. Unfortunately, domestic abuse still runs rampant in this “progressive” nation, of which there are many forms.
Either way, early voting is happening. So, it shall be interesting to see how it turns out.